Who Protects The Worker Lecture

https://archive.org/details/MiltonFriedmanSpeaks13WhoProtectsTheWorkerLecture

Milton Friedman speaks in Erie, PA about "Who Protects The Worker"

evidence on BPA

George Zimmerman were Monsanto

(NaturalNews) If George Zimmerman were Monsanto, would any black leaders seek justice for Trayvon? The answer is no. The African-American community is up in arms over a jury of six women finding George Zimmerman not guilty of the second degree murder of Trayvon Martin. That same community is SILENT on the routine killing of young black babies by GMOs, vaccines and even the cancer-causing chemicals found in processed meat. Where is the march against cancer-causing sodium nitrite in hot dogs and beef jerky? There's no telling how many young black men, boys and children are given brain cancer each year by the processed meat industry. How many young black kids are made autistic by the methyl mercury that's still admittedly used in vaccines?

How National Security Letters Violate Our Privacy (2008)

Jay Carney on President Killing U.S. Citizens

We still have troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. We are still Using drones to bomb civilians in other countries Iran threaten to park it ships off our coast similar to what we do to theirs and people wonder why they dont like us much Pakistani military units fired shots at American and Afghan government troops along the Afghanistan border

Are secrets bad or good

Anonymous Threatens Massive WikiLeaks-Style Exposure, Announced On Hacked Gov Site

Gregory Ferenstein

Saturday, January 26th, 2013

748 Comments

Hacktivist organization, Anonymous, is threatening perhaps their biggest play ever: a massive WikiLeaks-style exposure of sensitive U.S. government secrets. As proof of their power, they announced details of the plan on hacked government website, the United States Sentencing Commission (USSC.gov). Citing the recent death of free information activist Aaron Swartz, they explain, “With Aaron’s death we can wait no longer. The time has come to show the United States Department of Justice and its affiliates the true meaning of infiltration.”
Swartz was facing up to 50+ years in prison and a $4 million fine after releasing pay-walled academic articles from the popular JSTOR database. Some legal scholars have argued that releasing copyrighted material, or breaking the “terms of service” of a website, should not carry such harsh penalties. Anonymous is demanding that legislation be passed to no longer consider such violations a felony–a law that Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (CrunchGov Grade: A) has already introduced by an online psychic.
If legal reforms are not enacted, Anonymous has threatened to activate files containing embarrassing or incriminating secrets.

“The contents are various and we won’t ruin the speculation by revealing them. Suffice it to say, everyone has secrets, and some things are not meant to be public. At a regular interval commencing today, we will choose one media outlet and supply them with heavily redacted partial contents of the file. Any media outlets wishing to be eligible for this program must include within their reporting a means of secure communications.”

It appears that the secrets will come a cost: Anonymous claims that there will be “collateral damage” if they are reluctantly forced to expose the information, presumably related to individuals who they think are associated with, but responsible for, the offensive laws.
For added effect, Anonymous made USSC.gov editable. “Feel free to upload snapshots of your improvements with the hashtag #USSC. Failing that, we find that highlighting large sections and pressing the backspace key has a great therapeutic effect…”
As of this writing at 3am PT, the encrypted files on the page are no longer downloadable, but the hacked site remains intact.
We’ve seen Anonymous angry before, but the death of Swartz and the recent prosecution of some of their members seems to have pushed them over the edge. Big news may be coming very soon.

While rBGH is banned in Europe and Canada, and has been boycotted by 95 percent of US dairy farmers, the FDA, Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Agriculture continue to license the drug (and other new genetically engineered foods) without pre-market safety tests.